Well, I just don’t know what happened at my nephew’s “shaken baby syndrome” trial. He’s black; it was supposed to be a fair trial. He had an all white jury, but that shouldn’t matter, right?? In fact he was the only black in the courtroom, but that shouldn’t matter, right?? There weren’t any eye witnesses to the crime, but that shouldn’t matter, right?? But wait... there was one other person that could of committed this crime (the mother), but she was white, so they believed her, but that shouldn’t matter, right?? But wait... there was a third person that was there at the time that could of committed this crime, but (he was white) so he was automatically eliminated. Why did they accuse my nephew out of the three people that could have committed this crime?? Well, let’s see… the history in Massachusetts tells us that if you're black, and have been accused of a crime against a white person, you might as well kiss your black ass goodbye, because you are as guilty as you are black. Don’t let them fool ya; you are guilty in this state until proven innocent my friend. I would like someone out there to prove me wrong!! Start digging. If there aren’t any eyewitnesses to your crime, no DNA, no stories that are different from the one you told. Then human nature or bias kicks in. in other words “we have no way as far as evidence to prove that you did it, but your black so you probably did” that’s what happen to my nephew. He had as much of a chance as a snowball in hell. You always hear about a black man in this state spending years in jail for something he didn’t do, and now another one bites the dust. What’s up with that??